On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 06:02:37PM +0200, Alon Altman wrote: > On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > > >Eran Tromer wrote: > > > >>You keep missing a key issue. You assume that anything will be posted to > >>the list anyway, and the (indeed easy) question is only if it's > >>worthwhile to archive it. This neglects the possibility that some > >>content will not be posted in the first place if the author thinks that > >>it's likely to be web-archived. > >> > >Care to give an example? > > > >The last time we (you and I) had this discussion, it was about a list with > >about ten subscribers. At the time, I vaugely remember you saying that > >huge participants lists are not rellevent. > > The special beta edition of CrossOver Office that was posted here, might > not have been posted if it would have been archived.
Th file itself was on a public file server. The file itself was not posted. However that announcement itself is something to remember, for historical value. -- Tzafrir Cohen +---------------------------+ http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir/ |vim is a mutt's best friend| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +---------------------------+ ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
