On Monday 01 March 2004 17:25, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > ... > The basic reasoning behind allowing this, however, is explained. It is > in paragraph 72. Basically, the judge says that one vulnerable site is a > security problem for everyone, and it is therefor legitimate for > everyone to scan all sites. He also mentions (P. 73) that almost all > sites get scanned all the time anyways, and must therefor be able to > sustain such activity.
IMHO, the amount of cluefullness the judge presents in this verdict is nothing short of astonishing. I am *not* being cynical here (well, if being surprised by a judge being clueful can be considered non cynical at least...). I can almost imagine this judge playing with a FreeBSD box at night as a hobby... :-) Someone should give this guy the Cool Judge Award(TM) or something. Gilad -- Gilad Ben-Yossef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Codefidence. A name you can trust (TM) http://www.codefidence.com "I am Jack's Overwritten Stack Pointer" -- Hackers Club, the movie ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
