Ira Abramov wrote:

Well, you are echoing my thoughts: "cross out RH from the list of the
good-guys" understated. but this is the commercial world and my clients
demand it. according to what I have read here today I feel it's entirely
legal to copy and use the RHAS on as many stations as I want (the GPL
protects that right) but those machines won't have support, RHN accounts
nor indeed have binary RPMs for easy updates.

I would gladly install this for a customer explaining to him that for
automatic upgrades and patches he will need to pay between $300 and
$2500 per machine, depending on theplan and distro he chooses. I think
it's fair. I will also recommend he looks at SuSE or Debian as
alternatives (one cheaper but tested for Oracle, the other one cheaper
yet but with a learning and porting curve depending on the situation).

this sucks, but if this analysis is making sense to you all, it means
using the Fedora project may be a questionable step as well.

Your thoughts, as always, are most welcome...


If I remember correctly, you are not allowed to give them the CD as is, as that is diluting RedHat's trademark. You are allowed to replace above mentioned two files and then give them the CDs. The snag is that you then lose your Oracle certification. It will still work, as you havn't changed anything really. It just won't be Oracle certified.

I can't wait for UserLinux to fulfil its promise. If we get Oracle certificated Debian, these problems would be over.

--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Systems Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/


================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to