-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 29 December 2003 17:27, Aviram Jenik wrote:
> On Monday 29 December 2003 18:31, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> > ביום שני, 29 בדצמבר 2003, 14:48, נכתב על ידי Oleg Kobets:
> > > An extremelly well written letter.
> >
> > actually I do not think so.
>
> Diego, for some reason all your posts here seem to be negative - what's
> going on with you? I know you're not a negative guy!
>
> > Do you expect some stupid secretary who read those faxes actually
> > understand what a "man in the middle" attack is?
>
> No, I don't think that was Shachar's intention.
>
> I read what Shachar wrote, and it reminded me of a conversation I had with
> another Yashir-Rishon customer several days ago. He had the same complaints
> (including the lack of Mozilla support, and the bad/stupid security
> issues). I imagine that Shachar and this guy are not the only 2 that think
> so.

No, I've also sent them faxes (posted links to the sxw documents, here or to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], don't remeber), I admit that they're not so nice or well written 
as Shachar's (was fed up with them). All I got back was a standart reply 
(they sent the same answer to another subscriber of the list).

> But what should be the right course of action? Should we say "oh damn, this
> bank is stupid" and ignore it? Or should we tell Yashir Rishon what the
> problem is, in as much detail as possible, like a responsible consumer
> should do?
> Diego, did you expect Hayashir Harishon to contact you with telepathy and
> download your need with pppot? (ppp over telepathy, soon to be incorporated
> in kernel 2.8).
>
> > Shachar, face it you are screwed. I personally do not believe that they
> > will give you attention, just out of plain stupidity.
>
> Maybe they will, maybe they won't. If they won't (my friend heard the
> answer "you must upgrade your browser" and his reply was "I think I will
> upgrade my bank instead") than Shachar wasted his time. If they WILL, than
> Shachar did a huge favor for many open source people in Israel, and most
> important, he did a big favor to himself.
>
> In any event, I don't think Shachar is the one that is "screwed". It's
> Hayashir Harishon who is screwed, because they will soon stop enjoying
> Shachar's business (this is only an assumption, of course. I have no idea
> what Shachar's thoughts are on this). They will surely not enjoy *my*
> business in the short future, until they better their ways. This goes for
> anyone that I know and I can influence.
>
> Who's screwed now?...
>
> - Aviram
- -- 
Meir Kriheli
MKsoft systems
http://www.mksoft.co.il
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/8OJwRkS5DWK1mZkRApT0AJwMa8m9LwUdKtNlH4OVqxmWOPJcQwCglty+
GGlf/2+zm2+O58yPyBZqEbw=
=iTyF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

================================================================To unsubscribe, send 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to