Numbering is really not an issue. See, it can always
start at 3.0 as the first stable version. That
practice worked quite well with NT ;)

By that time Linux may still be at 2.8, and if for
some reason Linus will decide to go for the magic
Number 3.0, Hurd can launch as Hurd 2005 ...

btw, did anybody ACTUALLY try The Hurd? There's even
(or was) a Debian iso for it.

--- Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> Secondly, the development of Hurd took too much time
> to believe it can
> ever amount to anything. Linux (the kernel) is
> already at 2.6.x and is
> widely deployed and has a lot of features, and is
> taking the world by
> storm. Hurd is not even at 1.0, and its development
> began before Linus
> Torvalds started working on Linux. Will it ever be
> ready for prime-time?
> 
> Just my 20 agoroth.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>       Shlomi Fish
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Shlomi Fish        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Home Page:        
> http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/
> 
> Writing a BitKeeper replacement is probably easier
> at this point than getting
> its license changed.
> 
>       Matt Mackall on OFTC.net #offtopic.
> 
> 
>
=================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g.,
> run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to