On Saturday 20 September 2003 23:33, Shlomi Fish wrote: > On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Omer Zak wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Oded Arbel wrote: > > > I'd suggest you upgrade your mozilla to a later version as 1.0.1 is > > > ancient in terms of open source projects. > > > As a result, I can't really comment on any behavior or mis-behavior of > > > advanced scriptingfunctionality in your current browser of choice. > > > > In principle, you are right. > > > > In practice, my experience in upgrading packages in RedHat is not good. > > The DLL hell (or RPM hell) principle is in operation.There are all kinds > > of dependencies, which need to be upgraded as well, including (sometimes) > > the rpm tool itself. > > If all else fails, you can install Mozilla from the binary package on > mozilla.org. It can install itself under any arbitrary path. > > The problem with this approach is that an upgrade deletes the entire > directory under which it was installed. Thus, all the plug-ins that were > installed there would be lost.
Which is not a big issue - at most you'd download some binaries again. the user setting library remains the same (unlike under winXX for example where the mozilla user setting directory is by default under the installation path). -- Oded ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
