On Mon, Aug 04, 2003, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote about "Re: Trademarks, copyright licenses, the GPL and RedHat": > >On Sun, Aug 03, 2003, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote about "Trademarks, copyright > >licenses, the GPL and RedHat": > >>This includes their logo and name used on the software on their CDs. If > >>you want to distribute the software, you need to remove their trademark > >>from it. > >>... > >>Does this violate the principles of Free Software (note that I didn't > >>say anything about the GPL license - IANAL, I'm asking if you think it > >>hurts violates the philosophy of Free Software):
Richard Stallman just said something about this issue in an interview in "open for business" (whatever that is...). See http://www.ofb.biz/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=260 A relevant partial quote: Q: ... MandrakeSoft's Multi-Network Firewall is based on entirely Free Software, however the Mandrake branding itself is placed under a more restrictive license (you can't redistribute it for a fee). This give the user or consultant two choices -- use the software under the more restrictive licensing or remove the Mandrake artwork. What are your thoughts on this type or approach? RMS: I think it is legitimate. Freedom to redistribute and change software is a human right that must be protected, but the commercial use of a logo is a very different matter. Provided that removing the logo from the software is easy to do in practice, the requirement to pay for use of the logo does not stain the free status of the software itself. -- Nadav Har'El | Tuesday, Aug 19 2003, 21 Av 5763 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |----------------------------------------- Phone: +972-53-245868, ICQ 13349191 |echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx] http://nadav.harel.org.il |sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq'|dc ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]