This is a problem. It's a specific case of the rendering attack - in the end, telling spam from information is a sort of turing test, and to even try to make the decision, you have to judge the mail as it is rendered (not at any of the lower levels at which it is transmitted). But so far, I haven't received much spam like that.
Right now, the bayesian filter I use makes me quite happy. Daniel Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Daniel Vainsencher wrote: > > > I also use a bayesian spam filter, and am very happy with it. Also > > google "plan for spam"/"paul graham" - the guy that recently revived the > > interest in such filters. > > I have also noticed quite a few spams recently that were made to pass such > filters: > > Every suspicious keyword was cut in the middle (som of them: a number of > times) by html comments. > > Something like: > > MA<!-- sdfsdf -->KE MO<!-- sfsad -->NEY FA<!-- aweyj-->ST > > (At least I assume that this is their intention. I see no other point in > those comments) > > -- > Tzafrir Cohen > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
