Congratulations, You just bought Intel Hyperthreading processors. Don't expect any earth breaking performance from this (maximum 20% gain and even this is very rare)..
Thanks, Hetz On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 10:48:50 +0200, Boris Gorelik wrote > this is a VERY strange problem. My boss have bought a new computer > with two Xeon CPUs (he loves dual machines, and we don't comlain about > it ;) ). Last wednesday I've noticed that the top command showed 4 CPU's: > [bgbg]$ top -bn1i | head > 10:32am up 4 days, 1:03, 7 users, load average: 1.59, 1.37, 0.84 > 103 processes: 101 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped > CPU0 states: 89.0% user, 10.0% system, 0.0% nice, 0.0% idle > CPU1 states: 0.1% user, 0.0% system, 0.0% nice, 99.0% idle > CPU2 states: 0.0% user, 0.0% system, 0.0% nice, 100.0% idle > CPU3 states: 0.0% user, 2.0% system, 0.0% nice, 97.0% idle > Mem: 513400K av, 442124K used, 71276K free, 0K shrd, > 20064K buff Swap: 1068240K av, 0K used, 1068240K free > 213524K cached > > I have even opened the box to verify the number of the CPU's. > Does anyone know anything about this behaviour? How should I treat the > load fugures I get from top? > > System: RH7.3, kernel 2.4.18.3smp, top --version: top (procps version > 2.0.7) > > Have a nice life, > -- > Boris Gorelik > Sun, 10/Nov/2002, 5 Kislev 5763 > > ================================================================= > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command > echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
