On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:

> On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Reuven M. Lerner wrote:
> 
> > >>>>> "Tzafrir" == Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >   Tzafrir> There are a number of incompatible ways to encode Hebrew
> >   Tzafrir> (e.g: ISO-8859-8/visual, cp1255/logical and UTF-8). So
> >   Tzafrir> simply saying that the language is Hebrew is not enough
> >   Tzafrir> for the browser.
> >
> > No one is suggesting that the HTTP Content-type header should indicate
> > a language.Rather, the Content-type header indicates a character
> > set, and in some places an encoding as well.For example:
> >
> >   Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8        # Unicode, UTF-8
> >   Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-8   # Hebrew + English
> >   Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1255 # Heb/Eng Windows encoding
> >
> > A browser receiving the above headers knows not only that the content
> > is in Hebrew and English (or in Unicode), but also what the encoding
> > is (and thus how to display it).
> >
> > Naming the encoding explicitly would only be a problem on a site that
> > uses multiple encodings.For example, if your site has some pages in
> > UTF-8 and others in Latin-1 and still others in ISO-8859-8, then you
> > would be in trouble.But in such a (rare) case, you can remove the
> > default encoding and allow people to use meta tags.

using
<html lang="he" dir="rtl">
appears to override the charset header.

> 
> Quite rare indeed. The default configuration of apache (or at least: the
> one that comes with Mandrake):
> 
> http://www.gadot.org.il/manual/
> 
> http://www.gadot.org.il/manual/index.html.en
> http://www.gadot.org.il/manual/index.html.ja.jis
> 
> Not to mention all sorts of sites with multi-charset content.
> 
> >
> > On a site that has a single, consistent encoding, it's nice to have
> > the server take care of such things for you, avoiding the need for
> > meta tags.
> 
> (you mean: set everything to UTF-8)
> 
> >
> >   Tzafrir> Setting a server-wide default to a certain charset is
> >   Tzafrir> certainly not a wise default. I would consider it a
> >   Tzafrir> misconfiguration of RH's side.
> >
> > Given that this is the W3C's preferred way of doing things, it strikes
> > me as a pretty reasonable approach, actually.The implied default of
> > Latin-1 strikes me as pretty short-sighted in a world where a large
> > (and growing) number of Internet users come from outside of the US.
> 
> So you have my opinion about this standard, and how predictable it leaves
> things
> 
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Uri
http://translation.israel.net


=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to