> > it seems to me like so much double work on parallel KDE/Gnome
> > components is being done on one hand, while the differences between
> > the K and the G become smaller and smaller on the other hand, it's
> > just absurd.
> 
> Curious to notice that no one speaks about the horrible, criminal and
> insane duplication of effort going into maintaining separate Linux,
> FreeBSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD.  Why can't the dumbwits, who run those
> distributions and borrow ideas from each other, unify their 
> efforts and
> create The One True and Giant Distribution (TM, under penalty of
> anti-blasphamy laws)?

there is one major difference: all free unix flavors SHARE libraries and apps, and are 
consistent with one another.
which is exactly what i would expect of the two desktops. but G&K don't (or almost 
don't).

besides, if Gnome and KDE were to the desktop world what Linux and FreeBSD are to the 
OS world, things would be a bit different, wouldn't they?



================================================================To unsubscribe, send 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to