On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Dvir Volk wrote:
> but the unifying of the GUIs is something that should come from the
> _desktop developers themselves_. both Gnome and KDE, and especially us
> as users, could benefit from unified themes, widgets, styles, and
> interface consistency.
>
> it seems to me like so much double work on parallel KDE/Gnome
> components is being done on one hand, while the differences between
> the K and the G become smaller and smaller on the other hand, it's
> just absurd.
Curious to notice that no one speaks about the horrible, criminal and
insane duplication of effort going into maintaining separate Linux,
FreeBSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD. Why can't the dumbwits, who run those
distributions and borrow ideas from each other, unify their efforts and
create The One True and Giant Distribution (TM, under penalty of
anti-blasphamy laws)?
And on the other hand, in a world which accepts four separate ways of
building an Unix-like system, isn't it too much to expect it to accept two
ways of building desktop modules?
--- Omer
WARNING TO SPAMMERS: at http://www.zak.co.il/spamwarning.html
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
