On 2002-06-11, Christoph Bugel wrote:
> On 2002-06-11, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > open("foo", ...);
> > unlink("foo", ...);
> >
> > is obviously unsafe, since foo might be pointing to something else by
> > the time I unlink it. Suggestions?
>
> You know that you can do the unlink *immediately* after the open, right?
> you can still use the fd after that, but your "foo" link will live only
> for a couple of microseconds (or whatever).
> If I understand you correctly, you want to avoid even those
> microseconds? you want to make sure that the "foo" link *never* exists
> in any directory? (then why do you care for a fixed name, if the name
> never exists?)
Sorry, seems like I missed most of the discussions on this thread, because
mutt was thinking that these messages belong to another random thread. This
seems to happens with other threads too. Either bug in mutt (I upgraded to
1.4 a few days ago) or something else I did wrong..
I have to sort according to date now, if I want to see *all* messages..
Has anyone experienced this?
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
