On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 16:00:57 +0300 (IDT)
Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Oron Peled wrote:

> > It isn't in the dhcpd man because dhcpd DOES NOT USE THAT FILE!
> But RedHat's dhcpd does (at least in the way most users run it).

No it does not! The RedHat /etc/init.d/dhcpd script does!

> > Maybe we should have a man boot-scripts(8), pointed to by intro(8)..
 
> [boot-script(7) pointed-to by intro(7), you mean]

Hmmm... I think you are right that section 7 is better place.
 
> And also by dhcpd(8) .

This is not practical. Because along the same lines, you'll need to "fix"
named(8), sendmail(8) and anything else that gets started from init.d
However, in many cases the same daemons (e.g: sendmail) are being used
on *different* Linux and Unix platforms. Would you maintain a separate
manual page for sendmail (or qmail) for each different platform, just
because the platform *scripts* are different?
 
> You shouldn't have to look at the init.d script for that. You shouldn't
> have to guess that. It should be in the man page.

Agreed. And to just whine about it I wrote a basic boot(7) man page
and attached it. Anyone care to review it? (I spell checked, but I'm sure
not everybody need to suffer from my English level...)

[On Linux, just save it and man the file]

----------------------------------------------------------------
Oron Peled                             Voice/Fax: +972-4-8228492
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                  http://www.actcom.co.il/~oron

"It's almost like we're doing Windows users a favor by charging them money
for something they could get for free, because they get confused otherwise."
 - Larry Wall.

Attachment: boot.man
Description: Unix manual page

Attachment: msg19838/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to