then we are obviously talking about different thngs :)
can u give me a link to the project page for it ?
what i was talking about was specifically a patch :) if u want i can mail u
the patch to take a look at it.
On Thursday 30 May 2002 01:23, you wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 May 2002 19:16, Barak Kaufman wrote:
> > i compiled a clean 2.4.18 kernel it has emu10k1 support built in i
> > thought maybe the cvs driver would give better performance. i didnt
> > notice any change in the sb performance :) but i did feel a big change
> > once i switched to the nvidia drivers
> > btw just to be sure we are talking about the same thing i am talking
> > about a patch for the emu10k1.
> > maybe if there was a way to compile it as an external module the problem
> > of co existence could be solved.
> > i want to try to use the linmodem driver and will see how it goes along
> > with the nvidia drivers (2 external modules)
>
> Huh??
>
> Barak, the driver from emu10k1 cvs doesn't patch the kernel at all - it
> compiles outside the tree independently, no matter what kernel u use...
>
> Hetz
--
Barak Kaufman
Customer Support Manager
Oz-Tech Information Systems
================================================================To unsubscribe, send
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
