On Fri, Apr 26, 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote about "Re: weird stuff in linux-il": > See: > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
You can see it, but you should know that many people (including me) consider this guy to be wrong. He's forgetting all the reasons why Reply-To: is good, all the reasons why not adding a Reply-To: is bad, he's (in my opinion) exaggerating its slightly bad features. He's also shamelessly writing about bad things about the missing Reply-To: as if they are good things. I think that one day I should write a rebuttal article titled "Reply-To Munging Considered the best invention since sliced bread" ;) > I recall at least one time in the past when the list members decided (by > means of a vote) not to have a reply-to header. Yes, it was a close vote but we (the pro-Reply-To: camp) lost :( Maybe we should, like in any real democracy, repeat the elections every (say) year? It could be a fun linux-il virtual event :) With campains, debates, votes, and even exit polls... -- Nadav Har'El | Friday, Apr 26 2002, 15 Iyyar 5762 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |----------------------------------------- Phone: +972-53-245868, ICQ 13349191 |Entropy: Not just a fad, it's the future! http://nadav.harel.org.il | ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
