GB>> 4. To assume that we should somehow benefit from "central planning" is GB>> to assume that there is someone, or even a group of people, who knows GB>> what's best. This is in some way the premise behind "commercial"
Not exactly. It's assuming that some people have more manager talents than others - which is true. Some people are better idea generators, some people are better critics, some people are better coders, some people are better managers. The problem is that in chaotic environment project can be managed by best coder, and idea generation is left to manager, while the best idea generator is busy with QA... That can happen to commercial projects too, just on Open Source projects the lack of good management is sometimes more clear (since it is not hidden behind corporate walls). GB>> 5. last and very much not least: you seem to be trying to make the GB>> making of software more efficient. Why? who are you competing with? Open Well, maybe time? Lifetime is limited, so is time of day... Vita brevis, ars longa. GB>> & Free software are works of art. The great Chefs do not try to compete GB>> with Mcdonalds with the number of customers served. Do you not ENJOY That's true. But if some Chef would be making his soup for a week, most people would find no use of it, except couple of dedicated gourmet freaks (who would eat in other places anyway, but would come by when The Soup is ready). -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells phone +972-50-624945 /\ JRRT LotR. whois:!SM8333 ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
