Not more paranoid than the mplayer documentation.

It says something along the lines of "run this under root at your own 
risk. we assume it's a gaping security hole".

            Shachar

Tzafrir Cohen wrote:

>On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
>
>>Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>>
>>>Can't this be handled in terms of device file permissions? (create a
>>>group"mplayer" and either include yourself in it, or make the mplayer
>>>binary belong to it and SGID)
>>>
>>It might be easier to set up a SUDO class for it.
>>
>
>[snip exact settings]
>
>sudo is good to prevent others from runinng the command with strange
>command-line parameters that might have caused it to freak out (and give
>away a root shell, in the worst case).
>
>However, a movie player still handles a lot of untrusted data from the
>internet (the movies), so sanythizing the command-line doesn't do much
>good. With sudo the program still runs as root.
>
>This certainly applies to a program whose sources are scattered all over
>the internet, and thus the chances increase that you have a problematic
>plug-in (or that you won't hear about a necessary upgrade to such a
>plug-in)
>
>(Yes, I realize that this whole post was in paranoid-mode)
>



=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to