> i find your use of 2.4.18pre3-ac2 and 'stable' in the same sentance > amusing, if a bit oxymoronic, since that kernel has been out for all of > two days. maybe it does beautifully under stress, but what if it has a > hidden bug that causes it to degrade over time, so that in a week it's > unusable? [i doubt it, i'm running 2.4.18pre3-ac1 myself].
As a person who always loves to think that my machine can do what Sun E10K can do (just kidding) - I love to chalk it all the way - Graphics, network, sound, processor - all to be used extensively and parallel. Back then Redhat gave me an internal copy of 2.4.9-9 that they told me that have been passed their stress testing - well, it didn't pass my and thanks to Rik and Alan - it has been fixed. Of course I'm not trying to claim I'm better then Red Hat in testing, but I do have my own share of stress testing that I'm doing. It could fail to others of course (anyone wants to contribute a PC with 4GB of RAM machine for stress testing? I got an empty power outlet here ;) > that would be andre hedrick's ide stuff. it also contains rik van riel > and friends' latest vm work, rmap. read Alan's ChangeLog if you want to > know more. > > hetz, i'm glad this kernel is so stable for you. did you let lkml know? > or at least the developers themselves? I have been emailing back and forth between Alan Cox and me for the last 12 hours. > /me, who should stop reading lkml this mornign and start writing code. Yeah, and me to send another bunch of C.V's, make a real backup of my live system, and start playing with realtime scheduling a bit (1ms sounds good, compared to Windows 32ms).. Have a good day. Hetz ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
