oh my god, that mean another 2.96 gcc.. why can't they install a normal gcc as well?
Ely Levy System group Hebrew University Jerusalem Israel On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Christoph Bugel wrote: > On Thu 2001-12-13, Ely Levy wrote: > > 3.1 is a redhat release of gcc no? > > or is it the beta of the "offcial" gcc? > > There is no gcc 3.1 yet. When it comes out you will see it on gcc.gnu.org. > According to http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html it will take about 3 months. > > gcc 3.0.2 is quite good already. On linux it works just fine for me. on Solaris > also. (older solaris 2.6 boxes will need a few OS patches) on HP it works > except for a minor pthread issue, I think. On AIX I am also trying, but I got > some issues there as well, I hope I can fix them. > > Is anybody on this list using gcc 3.x for C++ on HP-UX or AIX yet? I would be > very interested! > > ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
