Hi, At 12:30 24/05/01 +0000, you wrote: >On Wed, 23 May 2001, Eran Levy wrote: > > > Hi, > > Actcom gives static IPs for not much money (less than Netvision or > > Internet-zahav). Actcom service ADSL and again less than the other ISPs (as > > I know). But, I recommend Netvision or Internet-zahav and I cant understand > > why you left them because I think they are giving a good service and > > offers. anyway, No-One of the ISPs like IP-masq. > >Actcom gives static IP on their ADSL connection for free - I know it's not >new, but I got this from a sales person : I think it means that they >gurantee it. I talked about dial-up static IPs and from my experience its not costs to much money as the other ISPs. >Also - their sales personal say that I can't connect a LAN to a regular >ADSL account ( I know that they can't detect it - but that is their >policy ), but I have to get a specially priced ADSL account that costs ><QUOTE> "10 times as much" </QUOTE>. > > > At 13:18 21/05/01 +0300, you wrote: > > >Please excuse me if you consider this an off topic post. I am asking here > > >because I respect the opinion of the Linux community and I am an avid > > >Linux user myself. > > > > > >My organization has been with Netvision for years now but frankly we're > > >not satisfied with the service and we're looking for a new ISP. I noticed > > >that IGLU uses Actcom so I suspect they are good. I have also heard that > > >Actcom gives static IP addresses (is this true?). We're on a ADSL > > >connection now so whoever we choose needs to have ADSL capability. Who > > >would you recommend and why? Also, do any ISPs have restrictions on using > > >IP-Masquerading (NAT)? > >In the company I work for, we switched from Netvision (completed the >switch just yesterday) to Bezeq Int. due to very bad support and very bad >service (in this order), but I have to say that I'm not impressed with >Bezeq Int.'s service as being superior. We did not, as yet, required >"buisness" tech support, so I can not attest to that, but several calls to >their ADSL tech support (we also have an ADSL line to Bezeq Int.) left me >with not real appreciation for the quality of it. when we complained that >the connection was almost unusable (very high latency, and high packet >loss), *only then* we were told that Bezeq Int. is upgrading their >lines, and this is to be expected in the next couple of days. > >We had been using ADSL guest account for both Barak and Actcom, on an >on and off basis. and I'm quite pleased with service quality. > >At home I'm subscribed to Barak on ISDN, and their service is ok . quality >is good and I get about 5 to 10 disconnects a week, though tech support is >non-existant. > >Oded ---- Regards, Eran Levy. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WebSite: http://come.to/liloboot ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
