Hello,

I tried reducing the MTU on the client box, and it doesn't help. I can't
see why it should -- the problem occurs when the *remote* host is
sending a large packet *into* the LAN.

Looking at captured network traffic both between the masquerading box
and the ADL modem and between the masquerading box and the client box, I
see no packet larger than 500 bytes. This means that the large packets
are eaten by the ADSL modem, or earlier somewhere out there.

  Eran


Dani Arbel wrote:
> 
> reduce the maxmtu of the win boxes to 1452 and they will work fine.
> Dani
> 
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Eran Tromer wrote:
> 
> > Howdy list,
> >
> > Thanks to mulix, my Linux ADSL connection is up and running. Next, I set
> > up IP masquerading, and encountered the following odd problem.
> >
> > When conneting from some host on the LAN, every time the remote host
> > tries to send "a lot of data at once" (a large TCP packet, perhaps?),
> > the masqueraded TCP connection is lost. So, for instance, when
> > telnetting to a POP server I can download short e-mails -- any number of
> > them, in fact -- but if I try to RETR a long e-mail the connection is
> > immediately broken (I don't even get the header). The same happens on
> > other ports (e.g, HTTP only retrieves short pages, telnet breaks on long
> > 'ls' outputs).
> >
> > >From the masquerading box (the one talking to the ADSL modem), all works
> > fine.
> >
> > Notably, the same happens with Windows2000 masquerading using ADSL,
> > while ISDN masquerading worked fine on the same Windows2000 box. I would
> > have suspected a fault in the modem (Orckit ATUR3) or ISP (Internet
> > Gold), but they're not supposed to be able to distinguish masqueraded
> > sessions, at least not nonmaliciously.
> >
> > On the Linux box which runs kernel 2.4.1, I set up masquerading using
> > # insmod ipchains
> > # ipfwadm-wrapper -F -a m -S 192.168.0.0/16 -D 0.0.0.0/0
> > (yes, compatibility layer upon compatibility layer, but may Murphy curse
> > me if I relearn those arcane command line options yet again!)
> >
> > I would have tried a 2.2 kernel, but since the same problem occurs with
> > Windows2000 this probably won't change anything.
> >
> > Any ideas? Did anyone else encounter this?
> >
> >   Regards,
> >     Eran Tromer
> >
> > =================================================================
> > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> > echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> =================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to