Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
>
> Ariel dear..
>
> 4 machines - all of them AMD, not a single problem with gcc-2.96-69, and with
> 10% speed increase over kgcc...
The Linux kernel has a fair amount of gcc hacks. gcc 2.9.6-69 is the _wrong_
compiler for building kernels. At best you might not notice anything
out of order, at worst you will run headlong into one of the gcc-specific
or gcc version-specific hacks, and discover just how badly 2.4 might with
the so-called gcc-2.9.6 (cvs snapshot).
For production 2.2 and 2.4, use ecgs-1.1.2 (gcc 2.91.66).
(BTW, this has been an ongoing discussion at linux-kernel list)
>
> Hetz
>
> On Sunday 28 January 2001 22:19, Ariel Biener wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> > Compile with kgcc (aka egcs-1.2 or so).
> >
> >
> > --Ariel
> >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > i have tried to compile the latest kernel, with gcc 2.92.66 (or similar).
> > > When I booted it the computer says "uncompressing linux...OK" and then
> > > gets stucked.
> > > Any suggestions? I did the same with kernel 2.25 (the one on RH6) with no
> > > problems..
> > >
> > > - diego
> > >
--
/---------------------- Omer Efraim -----------------------\
/--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove spam_me) --------\
| I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world |
| without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, |
| because they'd never expect it. |
\-- Jack Handey, Deep Thoughts ----------------------------/
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
