On Tue, Oct 24, 2000, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: reply-to field":
> It is.
>
> Read http://www.halisp.net/halisp/reply-to-harmful.html for complete
> details.
>
Now Shachar, that's not fair... I thought no propaganda during the poll :(
As I said (and explained) previously, the opinions in the above mentioned
website are completely wrong (at least, in my opinion ;))
Just think for yourself - when you *usually* reply to a message in this mailing
list, where do you want the reply to go to?
1) If you *usually* want the reply to go to the whole list, vote "Yes"
2) If you *usually* want the reply to go only to the person who wrote
the message, vote "No".
I emphesise usually, because you can always do something special to get the
other kind of reply. The reply-to header is there (or not there) as a
convenience, not as some sort of religious artifact.
VOTE YES! (if Shachar is allowed, than so am I ;))
--
Nadav Har'El | Tuesday, Oct 24 2000, 25 Tishri 5761
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |-----------------------------------------
Phone: +972-53-245868, ICQ 13349191 |How to become immortal: Read this
http://nadav.harel.org.il |signature tomorrow and follow its advice.
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
