Actually, I counted myself, Gilad and Aviram against, Nadav and you in
favour.

You can say that 60% of the votes were in favour of removing.

                Shachar

Schlomo Schapiro wrote:

> Hey,
>
> what do you mean "by popular demand" I saw exatly two postings in favour
> and against it !. This doesn't for sure count as "popular demand" (Unless
> you applied a very unequal weighting of the voices).
>
> Please put it right back in place, it was so nice and convienient.
>
> Schlomo
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Schlomo Schapiro
>
>  ---
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> WWW:   http://www.schapiro.org
>
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Alex Shnitman wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Due to popular demand the Reply-To: field has been removed from the
> > mailing list postings.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alex Shnitman                          | http://www.debian.org
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-----------------------
> > http://alexsh.hectic.net  UIN 188956    PGP key on web page
> >      E1 F2 7B 6C A0 31 80 28  63 B8 02 BA 65 C7 8B BA
> >
> > For Sale: Parachute. Only used once, never opened, small stain.
> >
> > =================================================================
> > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> > echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> =================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]


=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to