On Thu, Oct 19, 2000, Aviram Jenik wrote about "Re: firewall":
> >
> > Due to all that hassle, and the extremly "under cover" approach that both
> > Yosi and Eli have taken about the misdirected email, I vote the
> > "reply-to:" field be removed from the headers.
> >
> I second that. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe Shachar was the
> only one that asked for the reply-to feature. If my memory serves me right
> (and it rarely does), there's no reason not to remove this problematic
Hehhheem... Hehhheem...
I also wanted to have this header...
I still think that the reply-to header's benfits outway its problems, and
that people on a discussion list (not than an announcement list), should
not be conveniently replying to one another by email, and should enlighten the
rest of us with their reply.
Remember, that when somebody on the list asks a question, there's a high
probability that other people are interested in this question too - so any
replies directly to the person asking the question robs the other people on
the list of a chance to read those replies too.
But I lived with linux-il being the way it was for a year, and if you change
it back, I guess I will live with it again :)
To reply-to or not to reply-to, that is the question!
--
Nadav Har'El | Thursday, Oct 19 2000, 21 Tishri 5761
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |-----------------------------------------
Phone: +972-53-245868, ICQ 13349191 |A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax
http://nadav.harel.org.il |is a fine for doing well.
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
