Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote:
> I have used Arkeia successfully at a number of sites and unsuccessfully
> once with the evaluation version. The problem with Arkeia IMHO is that
> when it doesn't work it is very difficult to debug. However *when* it
> works it works very well. It's compression and remote backup facilities
> are especially good.
That is an understatement. Arkeia barfing usually means total lack of a
possibility
to find out WHY it barfed. And yes, when it works, it works well.
However, it is quite expensive too (roughly 5k euro for a library-enabled
version
with a 40-client pack) and has little in the way of support in Israel.
M
{.n+zwfj)mXze{"^ݺ{.n+^,jܞiלrzfXze{"
