> and to the more politicly aware
> linux users I explain my other ideological problems with their
> cathedral practices and license problems.
I guess you also don't use bind (cathedral), sendmail (cathedral), qmail
(cathedral). Also, read lkml and see how many patches not accepted into
the kernel only because linus/alan don't know the patch sender.
> feel free to comment, but don't make this into a religious war between
> KDE and other competitors, this is about license violations and
> ideologies.
Read some of the philosophy on www.gnu.org.
Then try to understand what is written there.
The GPL never was and never was meant to be some kind of a goal to reach
or a flag to wave. The only reason the GPL was written is to promote the
free software cause.
Being pro-GPL is stupid. Being pro Free Software is good. KDE is free
software. Qt-2.* is free software. Debian's position on illegality of
kde is petty lawyerese from the distribution that's supposed to be
farthest away from this stuff.
--
Matan Ziv-Av. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
