OE>> storage of just one instance is something else. If you just symlink
OE>> some files to a single file, and the owner of that file deletes it,
OE>> you're screwed. What this thingy does is take care of all of that (again,
Hardlink?
OE>> Good point. Still, I wouldn't expect HUGE savings (on their webpage they
OE>> say 80-90% - bah), and it's not really an enterprise-useful technology.
80-90% space saving???? Don't the also promise free weekend on Bahamas to
everyone using their technology - weekly, for lifetime?
Also, not that if hash is less than filesize, there's non-null chance that
the signature will bind files that arem't identical - which means, it's
unusable for any serious data storage unless it compares files bit-bit
every time.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-3-9316425 /\ JRRT LotR.
http://sharat.co.il/frodo/ whois:!SM8333
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
