Evgeny Stambulchik wrote: > As far as performance is considered, it's not RPM that usually matters (inspite > of a big hype), but the amount of cache on disk. Until recently (1-2 years), the > maximum cache on IDE disks was 128KB, while about each SCSI disk had 0.5MB. How come? The OS cache is much bigger (at least several MB). I thought that a level-2 cache has to be bigger to have any effect? If the block was not found in the OS cache, how can you expect to find it in the drive's cache? mmm.. maybe it's the read ahead and write back buffers that make the difference? A drive with a large buffer can get much more work done by itself without involving the OS.. maybe. -- Nimrod. ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- BP6/SMP (was: Re: Experience with 18G IDE HD) Alex Shnitman
- Re: Experience with 18G IDE HD Boris Singerman
- Re: Experience with 18G IDE HD Ben-Nes Michael
- Re: Experience with 18G IDE HD Gavrie Philipson
- Re: Experience with 18G IDE HD Eli Marmor
- Re: Experience with 18G IDE HD Udi Finkelstein
- Re: Experience with 18G IDE HD Eli Marmor
- Re: Experience with 18G IDE HD Evgeny Stambulchik
- Re: Experience with 18G IDE HD Eli Marmor
- Re: Experience with 18G IDE HD Evgeny Stambulchik
- Re: Experience with 18G IDE HD Nimrod Mesika
- Re: Experience with 18G IDE HD Evgeny Stambulchik
- Re: Experience with 18G IDE HD Udi Finkelstein
- Re[2]: Experience with 18G IDE HD Evgeny Stambulchik
- Re: Re[2]: Experience with 18G ID... Udi Finkelstein
- Re[4]: Experience with 18G IDE HD Evgeny Stambulchik
- Re: Experience with 18G IDE HD Mike Londarenko
- Re[2]: Experience with 18G IDE HD Evgeny Stambulchik
- Re: Experience with 18G IDE HD Mike Londarenko
- Re[2]: Experience with 18G IDE HD Evgeny Stambulchik