The hypervisor is an untrusted entity for TDX guests. It cannot be used
to boot secondary CPUs. The function hv_vtl_wakeup_secondary_cpu() cannot
be used.

Instead, the virtual firmware boots the secondary CPUs and places them in
a state to transfer control to the kernel using the wakeup mailbox. The
firmware enumerates the mailbox via either an ACPI table or a DeviceTree
node.

If the wakeup mailbox is present, the kernel updates the APIC callback
wakeup_secondary_cpu_64() to use it.

Reviewed-by: Dexuan Cui <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v8:
 - None

Changes in v7:
 - None

Changes in v6:
 - Added Reviewed-by tag from Dexuan. Thanks!

Changes in v5:
 - None

Changes in v4:
 - Added Reviewed-by tag from Michael. Thanks!

Changes in v3:
 - Unconditionally use the wakeup mailbox in a TDX confidential VM.
   (Michael).
 - Edited the commit message for clarity.

Changes in v2:
 - None
---
 arch/x86/hyperv/hv_vtl.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_vtl.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_vtl.c
index 2af825f7a447..fa4e7fda2868 100644
--- a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_vtl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_vtl.c
@@ -272,7 +272,15 @@ int __init hv_vtl_early_init(void)
                panic("XSAVE has to be disabled as it is not supported by this 
module.\n"
                          "Please add 'noxsave' to the kernel command line.\n");
 
-       apic_update_callback(wakeup_secondary_cpu_64, 
hv_vtl_wakeup_secondary_cpu);
+       /*
+        * TDX confidential VMs do not trust the hypervisor and cannot use it to
+        * boot secondary CPUs. Instead, they will be booted using the wakeup
+        * mailbox if detected during boot. See setup_arch().
+        *
+        * There is no paravisor present if we are here.
+        */
+       if (!hv_isolation_type_tdx())
+               apic_update_callback(wakeup_secondary_cpu_64, 
hv_vtl_wakeup_secondary_cpu);
 
        return 0;
 }

-- 
2.43.0


Reply via email to