> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2025 5:29 AM
> To: Haiyang Zhang <haiya...@microsoft.com>; linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org;
> net...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Dexuan Cui <de...@microsoft.com>; step...@networkplumber.org; KY
> Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>; Paul Rosswurm <paul...@microsoft.com>;
> o...@aepfle.de; vkuzn...@redhat.com; da...@davemloft.net;
> wei....@kernel.org; eduma...@google.com; k...@kernel.org; l...@kernel.org;
> Long Li <lon...@microsoft.com>; ssen...@linux.microsoft.com; linux-
> r...@vger.kernel.org; dan...@iogearbox.net; john.fastab...@gmail.com;
> b...@vger.kernel.org; a...@kernel.org; h...@kernel.org; t...@linutronix.de;
> shradhagu...@linux.microsoft.com; andrew+net...@lunn.ch; Konstantin
> Taranov <kotara...@microsoft.com>; ho...@kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH net-next,v5] net: mana: Add handler for
> hardware servicing events
> 
> On 5/22/25 2:22 AM, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> > @@ -400,6 +448,33 @@ static void mana_gd_process_eqe(struct gdma_queue
> *eq)
> >             eq->eq.callback(eq->eq.context, eq, &event);
> >             break;
> >
> > +   case GDMA_EQE_HWC_FPGA_RECONFIG:
> > +           dev_info(gc->dev, "Recv MANA service type:%d\n", type);
> > +
> > +           if (gc->in_service) {
> > +                   dev_info(gc->dev, "Already in service\n");
> > +                   break;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) {
> > +                   dev_info(gc->dev, "Module is unloading\n");
> > +                   break;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           mns_wk = kzalloc(sizeof(*mns_wk), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +           if (!mns_wk) {
> > +                   module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> > +                   break;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           dev_info(gc->dev, "Start MANA service type:%d\n", type);
> > +           gc->in_service = true;
> > +           mns_wk->pdev = to_pci_dev(gc->dev);
> > +           pci_dev_get(mns_wk->pdev);
> 
> Acquiring both the device and the module reference is confusing and
> likely unnecessary. pci_dev_get() should suffice.
> 

Thanks for the review. I updated the patch accordingly, and submitted
v6 yesterday.

Thanks,
- Haiyang

Reply via email to