On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 10:08:02AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:09:44PM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote: > > On 3/12/25 9:59 PM, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > @@ -753,6 +783,8 @@ static int vhost_vsock_dev_release(struct inode > > > *inode, struct file *file) > > > virtio_vsock_skb_queue_purge(&vsock->send_pkt_queue); > > > > > > vhost_dev_cleanup(&vsock->dev); > > > + if (vsock->net) > > > + put_net(vsock->net); > > > > put_net() is a deprecated API, you should use put_net_track() instead. > > > > > kfree(vsock->dev.vqs); > > > vhost_vsock_free(vsock); > > > return 0; > > > > Also series introducing new features should also include the related > > self-tests. > > Yes, I was thinking about testing as well, but to test this I think we need > to run QEMU with Linux in it, is this feasible in self-tests? > > We should start looking at that, because for now I have my own ansible > script that runs tests (tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test) in nested VMs to > test both host (vhost-vsock) and guest (virtio-vsock). >
Maybe as a baseline we could follow the model of tools/testing/selftests/bpf/vmtest.sh and start by reusing your vsock_test parameters from your Ansible script? I don't mind writing the patches. Best, Bobby
