> From: Michael Kelley <mhkli...@outlook.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2024 5:12 PM
> [...]
> What do you think about this (compile tested only), which splits the
> "init" function into two parts for devices that have char devs? I'm
> trying to avoid adding yet another synchronization point by just
> doing the init operations in the right order -- i.e., don't create the
> user space /dev entry until the VMBus channel is ready.
> 
> Michael

Thanks, I think this works! This is a better fix.

> +     if (srv->util_init_transport) {
> +             ret = srv->util_init_transport();
> +             if (ret) {
> +                     ret = -ENODEV;
IMO we don't need the line above, since the 'ret' from 
srv->util_init_transport()  is already a standard error code.

BTW, I noticed that the line "ret = -ENODEV;"
        if (srv->util_init) {
                ret = srv->util_init(srv);
                if (ret) {
                        ret = -ENODEV;
                        goto error1;
                }
        }
I think we don't really need that line, either. 
The existing 4 .util_init callbacks also already return a
standard error code. We can make a separate patch to clean
that up.

Thanks,
Dexuan

Reply via email to