Anirudh Rayabharam <anir...@anirudhrb.com> writes:
> From: Anirudh Rayabharam (Microsoft) <anir...@anirudhrb.com>
>
> 9636be85cc5b ("x86/hyperv: Fix hyperv_pcpu_input_arg handling when CPUs go
> online/offline") introduces a new cpuhp state for hyperv initialization.
>
> cpuhp_setup_state() returns the state number if state is CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN
> or CPUHP_BP_PREPARE_DYN and 0 for all other states. For the hyperv case,
> since a new cpuhp state was introduced it would return 0. However,
> in hv_machine_shutdown(), the cpuhp_remove_state() call is conditioned upon
> "hyperv_init_cpuhp > 0". This will never be true and so hv_cpu_die() won't be
> called on all CPUs. This means the VP assist page won't be reset. When the
> kexec kernel tries to setup the VP assist page again, the hypervisor corrupts
> the memory region of the old VP assist page causing a panic in case the kexec
> kernel is using that memory elsewhere. This was originally fixed in
> dfe94d4086e4
> ("x86/hyperv: Fix kexec panic/hang issues").
>
> Set hyperv_init_cpuhp to CPUHP_AP_HYPERV_ONLINE upon successful setup so that
> the hyperv cpuhp state is removed correctly on kexec and the necessary cleanup
> takes place.
>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 9636be85cc5b ("x86/hyperv: Fix hyperv_pcpu_input_arg handling when
> CPUs go online/offline")
> Signed-off-by: Anirudh Rayabharam (Microsoft) <anir...@anirudhrb.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c
> index 17a71e92a343..81d1981a75d1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c
> @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ void __init hyperv_init(void)
>
> register_syscore_ops(&hv_syscore_ops);
>
> - hyperv_init_cpuhp = cpuhp;
> + hyperv_init_cpuhp = CPUHP_AP_HYPERV_ONLINE;
Do we really need 'hyperv_init_cpuhp' at all? I.e. post-change (which
LGTM btw), I can only see one usage in hv_machine_shutdown():
if (kexec_in_progress && hyperv_init_cpuhp > 0)
cpuhp_remove_state(hyperv_init_cpuhp);
and I'm wondering if the 'hyperv_init_cpuhp' check is really
needed. This only case where this check would fail is if we're crashing
in between ms_hyperv_init_platform() and hyperv_init() afaiu. Does it
hurt if we try cpuhp_remove_state() anyway?
>
> if (cpuid_ebx(HYPERV_CPUID_FEATURES) & HV_ACCESS_PARTITION_ID)
> hv_get_partition_id();
> @@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ void __init hyperv_init(void)
> clean_guest_os_id:
> wrmsrl(HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID, 0);
> hv_ivm_msr_write(HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID, 0);
> - cpuhp_remove_state(cpuhp);
> + cpuhp_remove_state(CPUHP_AP_HYPERV_ONLINE);
> free_ghcb_page:
> free_percpu(hv_ghcb_pg);
> free_vp_assist_page:
--
Vitaly
