On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 01:22:05AM -0700, Erni Sri Satya Vennela wrote:
> Fix issues reported by checkpatch.pl script for hv_apic.c file
> - Alignment should match open parenthesis
> - Remove unnecessary parenthesis
> 
> No functional changes intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Erni Sri Satya Vennela <er...@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> I'm resending this patch because I have missed some email aliases in my
> previous mail.
> 
>  arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c
> index 5fc45543e955..0569f579338b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static bool cpu_is_self(int cpu)
>   * IPI implementation on Hyper-V.
>   */
>  static bool __send_ipi_mask_ex(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector,
> -             bool exclude_self)
> +                            bool exclude_self)
>  {
>       struct hv_send_ipi_ex *ipi_arg;
>       unsigned long flags;
> @@ -132,8 +132,8 @@ static bool __send_ipi_mask_ex(const struct cpumask 
> *mask, int vector,
>       if (!cpumask_equal(mask, cpu_present_mask) || exclude_self) {
>               ipi_arg->vp_set.format = HV_GENERIC_SET_SPARSE_4K;
>  
> -             nr_bank = cpumask_to_vpset_skip(&(ipi_arg->vp_set), mask,
> -                             exclude_self ? cpu_is_self : NULL);
> +             nr_bank = cpumask_to_vpset_skip(&ipi_arg->vp_set, mask,
> +                                             exclude_self ? cpu_is_self : 
> NULL);
>  
>               /*
>                * 'nr_bank <= 0' means some CPUs in cpumask can't be
> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static bool __send_ipi_mask_ex(const struct cpumask 
> *mask, int vector,
>       }
>  
>       status = hv_do_rep_hypercall(HVCALL_SEND_IPI_EX, 0, nr_bank,
> -                           ipi_arg, NULL);
> +                                  ipi_arg, NULL);
>  
>  ipi_mask_ex_done:
>       local_irq_restore(flags);
> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static bool __send_ipi_mask_ex(const struct cpumask 
> *mask, int vector,
>  }
>  
>  static bool __send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector,
> -             bool exclude_self)
> +                         bool exclude_self)
>  {
>       int cur_cpu, vcpu, this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>       struct hv_send_ipi ipi_arg;
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static bool __send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, 
> int vector,
>                       return false;
>       }
>  
> -     if ((vector < HV_IPI_LOW_VECTOR) || (vector > HV_IPI_HIGH_VECTOR))
> +     if (vector < HV_IPI_LOW_VECTOR || vector > HV_IPI_HIGH_VECTOR)
>               return false;
>  
>       /*
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static bool __send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, 
> int vector,
>       }
>  
>       status = hv_do_fast_hypercall16(HVCALL_SEND_IPI, ipi_arg.vector,
> -                                  ipi_arg.cpu_mask);
> +                                     ipi_arg.cpu_mask);
>       return hv_result_success(status);
>  
>  do_ex_hypercall:
> @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static bool __send_ipi_one(int cpu, int vector)
>                       return false;
>       }
>  
> -     if ((vector < HV_IPI_LOW_VECTOR) || (vector > HV_IPI_HIGH_VECTOR))
> +     if (vector < HV_IPI_LOW_VECTOR || vector > HV_IPI_HIGH_VECTOR)
>               return false;
>  
>       if (vp >= 64)
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Thanks for cleaning it up,
Reviewed-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssen...@linux.microsoft.com>

Reply via email to