I see. I think it's probably better to go ahead with the revert, and then apply
the patch I proposed in my previous e-mail (it's more straightforward and
introduces
fewer changes).
If you agree with that, I can submit both the revert and the patch.
Thanks
-Gustavo
Hi Gustavo,
I just built a kernel with your patch, on top of the NVMe FPIN link
integrity v9 patch set, and a test run on qla2xxx passes without any
field-spanning write warnings, nor with any null pointer dereference
errors.
Awesome. Thanks so much for testing it, Bryan. :)
Okay, so I'll go ahead and ACK the revert submitted by John (so as not
to duplicate efforts), and once it's applied, I'll submit the proposed
patch.
Thank you, folks.
-Gustavo
