On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 03:21:14PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 02:09:30PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > > When it comes to unmapping vdso: this would break user space since
> > > commit df29a7440c4b ("s390/signal: switch to using vdso for sigreturn
> > > and syscall restart") - there haven't been any reports.
> >
> > OK that seems to implicitly suggest that you're fine with sealing then?
> >
> > I had a quick glance and it seemed fine for s390. I mean it's _weird_ to
> > remap
> > any of this stuff so it'd be the odd one out that does it (ppc _seems_ to in
> > _some_ circumstances need it, for instance).
> >
> > So I think we're good? :)
>
> Yes, for s390 we are good.
Awesome :) series otherwise looks good.
