* jef...@chromium.org <jef...@chromium.org> [250303 00:09]:
> From: Jeff Xu <jef...@chromium.org>
> 
> Provide infrastructure to mseal system mappings. Establish
> two kernel configs (CONFIG_MSEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS,
> ARCH_SUPPORTS_MSEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS) and VM_SEALED_SYSMAP
> macro for future patches.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jef...@chromium.org>

Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <liam.howl...@oracle.com>


> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h | 10 ++++++++++
>  init/Kconfig       | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  security/Kconfig   | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 7b1068ddcbb7..8b800941678d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -4155,4 +4155,14 @@ int arch_get_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct 
> *t, unsigned long __user *st
>  int arch_set_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long 
> status);
>  int arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long 
> status);
>  
> +
> +/*
> + * mseal of userspace process's system mappings.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MSEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS
> +#define VM_SEALED_SYSMAP     VM_SEALED
> +#else
> +#define VM_SEALED_SYSMAP     VM_NONE
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif /* _LINUX_MM_H */
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index d0d021b3fa3b..c90dd8778993 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1882,6 +1882,28 @@ config ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_CALLBACKS
>  config ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_SYNC_CORE
>       bool
>  
> +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_MSEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS
> +     bool
> +     help
> +       Control MSEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS access based on architecture.
> +
> +       A 64-bit kernel is required for the memory sealing feature.
> +       No specific hardware features from the CPU are needed.
> +
> +       To enable this feature, the architecture needs to update their
> +       special mappings calls to include the sealing flag and confirm
> +       that it doesn't unmap/remap system mappings during the life
> +       time of the process. The existence of this flag for an architecture
> +       implies that it does not require the remapping of thest system
> +       mappings during process lifetime, so sealing these mappings is safe
> +       from a kernel perspective.
> +
> +       After the architecture enables this, a distribution can set
> +       CONFIG_MSEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPING to manage access to the feature.
> +
> +       For complete descriptions of memory sealing, please see
> +       Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst
> +
>  config HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
>       bool
>       help
> diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
> index f10dbf15c294..5311f4a6786c 100644
> --- a/security/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/Kconfig
> @@ -51,6 +51,27 @@ config PROC_MEM_NO_FORCE
>  
>  endchoice
>  
> +config MSEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS
> +     bool "mseal system mappings"
> +     depends on 64BIT
> +     depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_MSEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS
> +     depends on !CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
> +     help
> +       Apply mseal on system mappings.
> +       The system mappings includes vdso, vvar, vvar_vclock,
> +       vectors (arm compact-mode), sigpage (arm compact-mode), uprobes.
> +
> +       A 64-bit kernel is required for the memory sealing feature.
> +       No specific hardware features from the CPU are needed.
> +
> +       WARNING: This feature breaks programs which rely on relocating
> +       or unmapping system mappings. Known broken software at the time
> +       of writing includes CHECKPOINT_RESTORE, UML, gVisor, rr. Therefore
> +       this config can't be enabled universally.
> +
> +       For complete descriptions of memory sealing, please see
> +       Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst
> +
>  config SECURITY
>       bool "Enable different security models"
>       depends on SYSFS
> -- 
> 2.48.1.711.g2feabab25a-goog
> 

Reply via email to