On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 02:13:37PM +1030, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > +#define anode_btree container_of(&anode->btree, struct bplus_header, __hdr) > +#define ranode_btree container_of(&ranode->btree, struct bplus_header, __hdr) > +#define fnode_btree container_of(&fnode->btree, struct bplus_header, __hdr) > + > /* Find a sector in allocation tree */ > > secno hpfs_bplus_lookup(struct super_block *s, struct inode *inode, > @@ -27,7 +31,7 @@ secno hpfs_bplus_lookup(struct super_block *s, struct inode > *inode, > a = le32_to_cpu(btree->u.internal[i].down); > brelse(bh); > if (!(anode = hpfs_map_anode(s, a, &bh))) > return -1; > - btree = &anode->btree; > + btree = anode_btree;
Just for this - NAK. And then you proceed to add dozens more of the same. If it looks like a variable name, it must not turn out to be a bloody macro; if a macro expansion depends upon a local variable with given name existing in scope of its use, make that name an explicit argument. You manage to violate both.