On 2024/9/23 18:24, Julia Lawall wrote:
Thanks for testing it. I will see if there is some other way to improve the 
performance.

May be every rules in the same file are executed sequentially cost a lot?

Thanks,
Hongbo

Sent from my iPhone

On 23 Sep 2024, at 09:01, Hongbo Li <lihongb...@huawei.com> wrote:



On 2024/9/19 14:25, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024, Hongbo Li wrote:
After str_true_false() has been introduced in the tree,
we can add rules for finding places where str_true_false()
can be used. A simple test can find over 10 locations.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongb...@huawei.com>
---
  scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci 
b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci
index 5e729f187f22..6942ad7c4224 100644
--- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci
+++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci
@@ -85,3 +85,22 @@ e << str_down_up_r.E;
  @@

  coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_down_up(%s)" % e)
+
+@str_true_false depends on patch@
+expression E;
+@@
+-      ((E) ? "true" : "false")
++      str_true_false(E)
+
+@str_true_false_r depends on !patch exists@
+expression E;
+position P;
+@@
+*      ((E@P) ? "true" : "false")
Hello,
The semantic patch is quite slow.  Actually it tests a large number of
cases, eg where the parentheses are present and where they are not.
A small optimization is possible in the non-patch case.  The outer
parentheses are not needed, because you will already get the same
information whether they are there or not.
In contrast, for the patch case, the outer parentheses are needed, because
if they are there we want to remove them, since they are not needed for
the function call.
Could you update the depends on !patch cases to remove the outer
parentheses?

You mean in non-patch case, we could just write like the following?:

+@str_true_false_r depends on !patch exists@
+expression E;
+position P;
+@@
+*      (E@P) ? "true" : "false"

I have tested in my machine. The impact of this parenthesis on performance is 
very minimal.

With parentheses, the time on driver/ costs:

real    1m41.696s
user    85m24.069s
sys    1m8.891s

Without parentheses, the time on driver/ costs:

real    1m40.438s
user    85m53.987s
sys    1m7.981s


Thanks,
Hongbo

Also, just one patch would be fine.  There are many changes, but they are
all sort of the same, so it would be easier just to see them all at once.
thanks,
julia
+
+@script:python depends on report@
+p << str_true_false_r.P;
+e << str_true_false_r.E;
+@@
+
+coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_true_false(%s)" % e)
--
2.34.1




Reply via email to