On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 at 03:40, Mickaël Salaün <m...@digikod.net> wrote: > > The exit code is always checked, so let's properly handle the -ETIMEDOUT > error code. > > Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhigg...@google.com> > Cc: David Gow <david...@google.com> > Cc: Rae Moar <rm...@google.com> > Cc: Shuah Khan <sk...@linuxfoundation.org> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <m...@digikod.net> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240301194037.532117-4-...@digikod.net > ---
This looks good to me. It might make sense to use a switch statement
rather than a change of else-ifs if we end up handling more errors in
the future, but this is fine for now.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <david...@google.com>
Cheers,
-- David
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Added Kees's Reviewed-by.
> ---
> lib/kunit/try-catch.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/try-catch.c b/lib/kunit/try-catch.c
> index 73f5007f20ea..cab8b24b5d5a 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/try-catch.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/try-catch.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch,
> void *context)
> time_remaining = wait_for_completion_timeout(&try_completion,
> kunit_test_timeout());
> if (time_remaining == 0) {
> - kunit_err(test, "try timed out\n");
> try_catch->try_result = -ETIMEDOUT;
> kthread_stop(task_struct);
> }
> @@ -94,6 +93,8 @@ void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch,
> void *context)
> try_catch->try_result = 0;
> else if (exit_code == -EINTR)
> kunit_err(test, "wake_up_process() was never called\n");
> + else if (exit_code == -ETIMEDOUT)
> + kunit_err(test, "try timed out\n");
> else if (exit_code)
> kunit_err(test, "Unknown error: %d\n", exit_code);
>
> --
> 2.44.0
>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
