On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:54:26AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > > do_soemthing(seq_buf_cstr(s)); > > > > Do we really need to call it _cstr? Why not just have seq_buf_str() ? > > > > I mean, this is C, do we need to state that in the name too? > > I'm fine either way. I did that just to make the distinction between our > length-managed string of characters interface (seq_buf), and the > %NUL-terminated string of characters (traditionally called "C String" in > other languages). And it was still shorter than "seq_buf_terminate(s); > s->buffer" ;)
'cstr' might be short for 'counted string' ...
