Would it make sense to have another mailing list for such discussions (like planning some events)?
>>> Vladislav Bogdanov <[email protected]> schrieb am 26.11.2014 um 16:53 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: > 25.11.2014 12:54, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:... >> >> OK, let's switch tracks a bit. What *topics* do we actually have? Can we >> fill two days? Where would we want to collect them? >> > > Just my 2c. > > - It would be interesting to get some bird-view information > on what C APIs corosync and pacemaker currently provide to application > developers (one immediate use-case is in-app monitoring of the cluster > events). > > - One more (more developer-bounded) topic could be a "resource degraded > state" support. From the user perspective it would be nice to have. One > immediate example is iscsi connection to several portals. When some > portals are not accessible, connection still may work, but in the > "degraded" state. > > Best, > Vladislav > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
