Vladislav Bogdanov <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Kristoffer, Dejan. > > Do you have plans to add support to crmsh for 'resource-discovery' > location constraint option (added to pacemaker by David in pull requests > #589 and #605) as well as for the 'pacemaker-next' schema (this one > seems to be trivial)? > > Best, > Vladislav >
I haven't had time to look closer at resource-discovery, but yes, I certainly intend to support every option that makes it into a released version of pacemaker at least. As for the pacemaker-next schema, I thought I had added support for it already, but I haven't actually tested it :) But yes, it should be usable in theory at least, and if it is not, that is a bug that I will fix. -- // Kristoffer Grönlund // [email protected] _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
