Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> writes: >> What about changing the question to "What now? (Keep|Fix|Revert)? > > Apparently, keep didn't seem to be an option at the time :) > >> (With the obvious semantics: Keep=Keeps the changes as written, Fix=Try >> again to fix the problem, Revert=Revert to the loaded configuration) > > I assume that this could be improved, but it is not clear in > which way. I wonder how does the crmsh v2.0 behave in this case. >
I have started working on a fix for this, but it turned out to be trickier than expected. So the behavior in the current version is roughly the same as in 1.2.6. > Thanks, > > Dejan > >> I assume I did something dirty on my system: Just updated the RA on one >> node, so the other node didn't know about the new RA, but anyway... >> >> Regards, >> Ulrich >> >> -- // Kristoffer Grönlund // [email protected] _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
