On 02/06/14 04:42 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:43:49PM -0500, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 05/29/2014 12:01 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
what's the answer for ... Centos, I guess...? And it does
embarrass me to have to ask that.
Pacemaker/corosync -- 2+-node clusters, active-active clusters, active
development. Support for free is 50% chance Lars will ask you if you're
a paying Suse customer.
Heartbeat 'R1' (i.e. as long as you don't use 'crm' mode) -- simple,
stupid, has been rock solid (and, consequently, untouched) for years.
2-node active/passive clusters only, DIY external resource monitoring
(mon), the level of support is: Digimer will tell you "upgrade to
pacemaker".
What do you intend to run in HA mode?
1. thx to all who replied. i've been hammered on for a few days and
got behind on reading the replies.
2. it'll be centos, and i'll do Pacemaker/corosync since
it's new and it's my thing -- no external requirements.
Good call. Be sure to use 6.5(+) and check the pacemaker website's docs
on configuring cman for use with pacemaker (a requirement that will go
away in RHEL 7, but has no fundamental impact of pacemaker's config and
use beyond initial setup). If you need help with this, don't hesitate to
ask. Effectively; Use 'ccs' to do the initial 'cman' config. This will
handle the corosync setup for you.
3. bind/named/dns, possible some fortran programs.
That should be no problem.
thanks again.
Anytime. Pop by freenode's #linux-ha and/or #linux-cluster as well.
Great little HA community there.
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
