On 29/07/13 18:19, David Vossel wrote:
hey,
Historically the ocf resource agents have been shipped under the 'heartbeat' provider
alias. Now that pacemaker exists, the legacy name "heartbeat" is slightly
confusing since it refers to another project. We should change this.
How would you all feel about moving all the 'heartbeat' provider agents into a
new provider called 'core', and then for legacy purposes create a 'heartbeat'
symlink that points to the 'core' directory so no one's configuration breaks...
Eventually some day we could move in the direction of depreciating the use of
the 'heartbeat' provider entirely.
good plan? any thoughts?
-- Vossel
How does this compare to the Red Hat fence/resource-agent packages? I'm
very happy to see "heartbeat" and it's inherent confusion go away, so I
am fundamentally for this. I only question "core" and how it will relate
to those fence and resource agents.
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
