01.07.2013 18:29, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:29:31PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to look if it is now safe to delete non-running nodes >> (corosync 2.3, pacemaker HEAD, crmsh tip). >> >> # crm node delete v02-d >> WARNING: 2: crm_node bad format: 7 v02-c >> WARNING: 2: crm_node bad format: 8 v02-d >> WARNING: 2: crm_node bad format: 5 v02-a >> WARNING: 2: crm_node bad format: 6 v02-b >> INFO: 2: node v02-d not found by crm_node >> INFO: 2: node v02-d deleted >> # >> >> So, I expect that crmsh still doesn't follow latest changes to 'crm_node >> -l'. Although node seems to be deleted correctly. >> >> For reference, output of crm_node -l is: >> 7 v02-c >> 8 v02-d >> 5 v02-a >> 6 v02-b > > This time the node state was empty. Or it's missing altogether. > I'm not sure how's that supposed to be interpreted. We test the > output of crm_node -l just to make sure that the node is not > online. Perhaps we need to use some other command.
Likely it shows everything from a corosync nodelist. After I deleted the node from everywhere except corosync, list is still the same. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
