On 2013-05-22T00:23:35, Digimer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2. Pacemaker is the future of HA clustering. It is expected that, in
> RHEL 7, Pacemaker will replace RHCS. So there is a strong argument to
> start with pacemaker now.
>
> The main problem that might push you away from Pacemaker (and what keeps
> me personally on RHCS) is that Pacemaker is in "Tech Preview" mode in
> RHEL. What this means is two fold;
Just for completeness, both DRBD and Pacemaker+corosync are fully
supported on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, and have been for years.
That boils down to a question of support priorities - is the base
enterprise distribution more important than the specific HA features.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
